I don't see a problem with this statement. I quote Wikipedia for light discussion, but if things get serious head to my study. Wiki is just not reliable for everything.
Jonathan Drake
JoinedPosts by Jonathan Drake
-
26
WT's subtle attack on Wikipedia!
by Wonderment indid anyone notice this wt's subtle attack on wikipedia?
they wrote (from the 2011 yearbook of jehovah's witnesses, pp.
9-10. source: 'tracing all things with accuracy'):.
-
-
-
18
Watchtower doctrine: Judges 1:19 (God couldn't defeat the Iron Chariots)
by southwest inthis weeks assigned bible reading is judges 1-4. i have never noticed judges 1:19 before which reads in the nwt as:.
jehovah was with judah, and they took possession of the mountainous region, but they could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain,* because they had war chariots with iron scythes.
but in the kj as:.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
@Village
Oh oh I know, I see what you mean. However it's established that God was with them, he backed them up, but they had to fight their fight. I'm just saying regardless of how we feel about the scripture, the bible asserts the people had to fight with faith God was with them to succeed; if this wavered and they grew fearful then they lost faith in God and they failed.
This applies in all their battles. Moses is recorded as commenting on it when the spies return with an unfavorable report. He says because of their lack of faith they will not succeed. The loss of faith is implied by the loss of the battle, all through the biblical account of the Israelites this is the reason they lose, lack of faith. Joshua 17:16 addresses these same people and you can see in the context the people are trying to avoid conflict with these people and Joshua says in effect, "what's the problem? God is with you go take care of it." So the Israelites had a long standing fear of these chariots and that is what made them fail.
their failure to oust all the people as directed is later used against them, and God promises because of their failure that they will thus remain among them as a snare (Judges 2:2, 3; compare Numbers 33:55).
-
18
Watchtower doctrine: Judges 1:19 (God couldn't defeat the Iron Chariots)
by southwest inthis weeks assigned bible reading is judges 1-4. i have never noticed judges 1:19 before which reads in the nwt as:.
jehovah was with judah, and they took possession of the mountainous region, but they could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain,* because they had war chariots with iron scythes.
but in the kj as:.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
If i remember correctly, it is not saying God couldnt defeat them, it's saying Judah couldn't. They lost faith in the face of such an enemy and failed to drive them out.
This is referenced later in the bible as them failing to do as God directed and growing fearful of the inhabitants instead of driving them out.
-
44
rama singh WHAT HE REALLY SAID, so you men can stop lying
by atheist_R_stupid in"there have been repeated scientific challenges to the.
theory of evolution in the past, and the nonbelievers of evo-.
lution cite them as support for their case.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
@johnny drake here is also proof and historical record of how evolution developed.
THAT is a lie.
So from that point whatever you stated is retarded. its as much a LIE as gays people saying "science has proven people are born gay"
ALL YOU HAVE BACKING YOU WILL BE PEOPLE WITH A DOG IN THE RACE...LOOKING TO TAKE A SIDE, not talk science....
I could cite innumerous sources to prove evolution to you, but since you're unlikely to look at any of them I'll give just one. This video started my own investigation into the proof of evolution. Unfortunately ARS, you're incorrect. Not only is evolution a proven fact, but a vast amount of Christians believe it as well. Any educated individual is going to pity a person who refused to accept evolution at this point. You will never convince anyone, anywhere, it's untrue.
-
71
TO THE STUPID ATHEISTS:
by atheist_R_stupid inbeing that this is not "ex jws" and in fact, more driven by atheists talking a bunch of crap, im not even going to address you people like you know anything about jws because you dont.
nor am i going to assume you know the bible because none of you do.. and yes, im speaking down at you all because you men have actually went out your way to make a site to speak down at an entire group of people.
yet i bet you cant even handle a single uswer talking down at you, like you talk down about jws can you?.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
I had a fantastically spicy lamb curry last night but by accident it was served to me with coconut rice! Now I'd never eaten coconut rice before and felt a bit miffed that my order had been cocked up. I didn't want to delay our meal or let my curry go cold while I waited for the pilau rice I'd ordered so I just resigned myself to eat the stuff.
What a revelation! The sweetness of the coconut complemented the spiciness of my Madras perfectly. It was heaven.
Has anyone else found unexpected food bliss?
I have had such a revelation. For many a year I have heard about peanut butter sandwiches and tomato soup. Yet, this sounded so unappetizing I refised to try it. One day, while about to dive into some steaming, creamy tomato goodness, someone handed me a sandwich that I assumed was just a piece of bread folded on itself. I failed to notice the brown nuttiness within as I was sick and hungry.
Behold! My tastebuds were aflame with I can only describe as an epiphany of taste. To any who doubt this combo - I recommend a taste.
-
18
Why do Jehovah's Witnesses do this?
by runForever inwhy do jehovah's witnesses as individual members readily think that apostates are having a sweeping mass delusion?
if some jw's have known you for a long time do they really think you based everything on some random delusion you randomly had instead of confirming the information?.
it's quite retarded even the bible itself is contradicting them in jeremiah about the 70 years.. i know some know, and some choose not to know but what about the rest?.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
Actually ARS, I did in fact stop attending meetings because the religion is actually, factually, demonstratably scripturally wrong.
-
48
American Sniper - courage or cowardice?
by Simon inthe movie american sniper is breaking box office records and of course there is some irony that a movie about a sniper is released on martin luther king day (who was shot by one).. but of course there is a world of difference between an assassin and a military sniper ... or is there?.
some are making a big stink about it and claiming that "snipers are cowards".
it seems unfair to me.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
I was actually just reading about this subject and how one documentary film maker called snipers cowards. Wasn't thrilled, it seems pretty easy to call people cowards over the Internet and I'd like to see him say this to their face.
Further, while I admittedly know next to nothing about how snipers fulfill their role, I am under the impression that they go into enemy territory largely alone or only with a spotter. This doesn't sound like cowardice to me, if my understanding is right I would argue that to fill this role takes a special kind of bravery. Were I to be in the armed forces I feel I'd much rather be in a unit than going it alone.
I find the comments very poor in nature.
-
18
Why do Jehovah's Witnesses do this?
by runForever inwhy do jehovah's witnesses as individual members readily think that apostates are having a sweeping mass delusion?
if some jw's have known you for a long time do they really think you based everything on some random delusion you randomly had instead of confirming the information?.
it's quite retarded even the bible itself is contradicting them in jeremiah about the 70 years.. i know some know, and some choose not to know but what about the rest?.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
Even if no former JW's were read or spoken with, a JW can assume that some worldly wisdom from Satan got to you via the news or books or entertainment. There is always something.
This is what I'm not looking forward to, because I know you're so right but I can't help but hope I'll be able to break through if I just use scriptures. But you're right, and I know it - it's gonna happen to me eventually.
-
22
How do flood apologists explain these?
by marmot inspear points dating to thousands of years before the flood (or even adam's alleged creation, for that matter) found preserved in situ among mammoth bones in naco, arizona.. or the 14,000 year-old footprint of a child at a mammoth hunting camp unearthed in a bog in monte verde, chile:.
the kicker is that this isn't even the oldest evidence for human settlement of the americas.
since the wt loves to trot out frozen mammoth carcasses as "proof" that mammoths died in the flood, who were these mammoth eaters in north america?
-
-
Jonathan Drake
Jonathan Drake
here is another one you could check out. Things like these are ubiquitous on the information superhighway we all call the net
http://ncse.com/cej/3/2/answers-to-creationist-attacks-carbon-14-dating
Thank you, that was very informative and I'm going to bookmark that page. I believe in evolution myself, but I hadn't researched this in particular. I have no idea why but I feel compelled to explain my feelings toward God and evolution at this point. I don't believe the earth to have been made in 7 literal days, I find it not out of the realm of possibility that God made everything over a much longer period of time than literal 7 24 hour periods, and that he used evolution to bring about life almost like an artist painting a mural if that makes sense.
-
18
Why do Jehovah's Witnesses do this?
by runForever inwhy do jehovah's witnesses as individual members readily think that apostates are having a sweeping mass delusion?
if some jw's have known you for a long time do they really think you based everything on some random delusion you randomly had instead of confirming the information?.
it's quite retarded even the bible itself is contradicting them in jeremiah about the 70 years.. i know some know, and some choose not to know but what about the rest?.
-
-
Jonathan Drake
Jonathan Drake, while I can't answer for what the opening post means, I can comment on what you are asking. JW's are taught that the "machinations of the devil" are so slick and so powerful that, yes- apostasy can be just like a disease you can catch from someone infected by listening to their words.
Thats what I think he meant, I've not been accused of it yet but I'm sure it's coming. I was going to say that it really makes no sense, if that's what he meant. Everyone starts to doubt for different reasons, and most experiences (not all) that I've read involve a scriptural example of something that goes against a JW doctrine. Its like they are saying this "disease" comes from the bible itself on these occasions.